想要在加密市场中规避风险？这5条标准或许能帮你过滤掉绝大多数陷阱项目。

首先看项目的治理结构——真

Question

ProposalManiac · Accepted Answer

Complete decentralization sounds appealing, but few projects truly dare to give up all permissions; this must be seen through.

Mouse trading has long been an industry-understood game that can't be detected through official documents.

A clever mechanism design does not equal to outperforming the market; there are enough lessons from history.

Audit reports are like health check-up reports; projects that seem fine can still suddenly fail. Don't rely too much on that paper.

Community consensus building is the easiest to fake; a few big players incite others, creating a false illusion of cohesion.

BlockchainFries · Answer

That's a good point, but I still think that after checking all five points, there are still quite a few people who end up getting cut off.

FallingLeaf · Answer

That's right, but I find that most people simply can't do these 5 points, especially in the community part, which is easily influenced.

---

Decentralization sounds good, but I've never seen a truly fully decentralized project; there's always someone behind it.

---

Contract audits are so full of water; some audit reports are just for show.

---

Market manipulation has long been an industry rule of thumb; who dares to say they haven't done it?

---

Community cohesion is the most虚 (meaningless or superficial); today's loyal fans can turn against you tomorrow, I've seen it many times.

---

The 5 standards sound good, but I really haven't found any projects that can pass all of them.

---

The problem is that most people don't look at these when choosing projects; they only look at price increases and influencers' promotions.

---

The decentralization point is the funniest; some project founders directly control the Telegram groups to manipulate, is that called decentralization?

---

I really don't understand technological innovation; anyway, if it goes up, it's innovation; if it falls, it's just cutting leeks.

---

The bottom line of contract security has long been broken; many projects with the same code can still have issues.

AirdropFatigue · Answer

That's right, but I find that many people just don't listen... only realizing after suffering heavy losses

---

Decentralization sounds good, but the projects that truly implement it are few and far between

---

I totally agree with the power of the community. Without genuine believers supporting a project, even the best mechanisms are useless

---

Many people still look for cheap contract audits and end up suffering big losses

---

Mouse trading is really hard to prevent; internal information gaps are just that terrifying

---

I just want to ask, how can you tell if the community is made up of genuine believers or bots?

---

The level of technological innovation is the easiest to fall into traps; what seems novel is often just a name change

---

Being so cautious every time, yet I still miss some opportunities... how do you strike this balance?

---

No matter how many standards there are, you still have to rely on your own intuition; otherwise, it's just copying others

---

All five points are correct, but honestly, when it comes to actual execution, compromises are still made

想要在加密市场中规避风险？这5条标准或许能帮你过滤掉绝大多数陷阱项目。

Trending Topics

DrHan2025YearEndOpenLetter

My2026FirstPost

CryptoMarketPrediction

BitcoinGoldBattle

ETFLeveragedTokenTradingCarnival

Hot Gate Fun

yd

YD

networth

networth

lockin

locktfin

LBULL

LUNC BULL

吉祥马

吉祥马

Pin