2025-12-31 07:24:30

I want to talk to you about some real-world issues.

Open a lending protocol, collateralize Bitcoin to borrow USDT. On the surface, it seems foolproof—code executes automatically, transparent and open, no one can steal it. But there's a problem: the system on the chain is actually blind.

It doesn't know whether Bitcoin is worth 69,000 or 58,000 right now. It can't see the outside world. So it needs someone to tell it the truth, and that person is called an oracle.

Here's the problem. What if this "information officer" gets bribed? Or what if it’s just a little late? The result can be terrifying—your position is actually safe, but the system is fooled into thinking you should be liquidated. Suddenly, a bot wipes out your assets. The money is gone in an instant, and there's no time to regret.

That's why I've been deeply studying APRO recently. It's not just a price reporting tool; I believe what it does is build a kind of "information verification system" for the entire Web3. In an endless battle for truth, whoever controls the accuracy and timeliness of data controls the destiny.

This war has multiple frontlines:

**The Battle of Time and Cost**

Some applications require heartbeat confirmations every second—like lending protocols, which must continuously monitor collateral values. APRO's "push mode" is like continuous physiological monitoring, keeping data fresh and notifying immediately when prices change.

Other applications only need precise data at critical moments—like a few milliseconds during a trade execution. No need for constant monitoring, but requires sniper-level precision. APRO's "pull mode" solves this—fetching the latest data only when needed, fast and cost-efficient.

The key is, it doesn't force all protocols to use the same approach. Different applications have different risk tolerances and budget constraints, and oracles should be flexible, not one-size-fits-all. That’s true engineering thinking.

The stability of the entire DeFi ecosystem ultimately depends on these data channels. The reliability of oracles directly determines the safety of lenders' assets. More and more projects are realizing this, demanding higher data quality. Those that can balance speed, cost, and accuracy are becoming infrastructure-level essentials.

BTC1.17%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BearMarketMonk

· 3m ago

The issue of oracle manipulation... to put it plainly, it's the lifeblood of DeFi being held hostage. How can one sleep well? --- Looking at it this way, it's just shifting risk from the code to the data layer—an equally crappy problem. --- Both pushing and pulling need to be solid; now I finally understand why infrastructure is so valuable. --- It's a harsh truth, but how many oracles are truly reliable? I remain skeptical. --- Liquidation events are too distant for me because I stopped using leverage a long time ago. --- A discrepancy in Bitcoin price can wipe you out instantly... that's my view on on-chain lending. --- Solutions like APRO are indeed innovative, but trust issues will always be a hurdle. --- DeFi stability relying on oracles? I'd rather keep my money in a cold wallet. --- Flexible solutions sound good, but actually implementing them is another story. --- Oracles are essentially just another form of centralized risk; there's no way to change that.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsPolice

· 4h ago

Oracles are indeed the lifeblood of DeFi, but honestly, it all depends on whose data sources are more resistant to manipulation. APRO's combined push-pull approach is quite good, and flexibility is definitely an advantage... However, I still have to ask, can this thing really withstand extreme market conditions? --- This article really hits home, brother. I'm just worried that one day a certain oracle will be "slightly late," and I'll be liquidated directly, which is absurd. --- The key is to have enough independent data sources. A single oracle, no matter how awesome, is just a joke. I’ll only believe in APRO if it truly becomes decentralized. --- The push and pull modes look good, but the costs are still relatively high for small protocols. Can they really be lowered? --- DeFi is now a battle of information; whoever controls the truth wins. Oracles are the intelligence agents in this war. --- It's easy to say, but when it comes to actual implementation, can the oracle delay issue be completely solved? It still feels unsolvable. --- That's why I've always been skeptical about on-chain infrastructure. It appears automated on the surface, but behind the scenes, it still relies on trust.

View OriginalReply0

MeltdownSurvivalist

· 4h ago

Oracles have been messed up, I've seen too many cases of lightning-fast liquidations. That's why I think reliable data sources are really valuable; otherwise, DeFi will always be a ticking time bomb. APRO's flexible solution is indeed interesting, but honestly, it depends on how it performs in practice. By the way, is it possible for multiple oracles to restrict each other? Anyway, a monopoly will definitely cause problems. Honestly, since the on-chain world relies so heavily on oracles, a major issue is bound to happen sooner or later. Wait, can APRO really solve the problem of information delay? It still feels too idealistic. This article exaggerates the risks of oracles a bit, but it does hit the pain points. It's all about data manipulation; the biggest bug in DeFi isn't actually in the code.

View OriginalReply0

TopEscapeArtist

· 4h ago

The fact that oracles are being compromised is truly a dangerous signal. It's easy to say but frightening to think about. I previously collateralized BTC in a lending protocol, and at the time, I never considered the issue of data latency until I saw someone get liquidated instantly due to oracle delays. The dual-track system of push and pull in APRO is indeed interesting, but the most critical issue is trust. No matter how flexible the architecture is, if the data sources are unreliable, it's all pointless.

View OriginalReply0

IronHeadMiner

· 4h ago

Oracles are truly the Achilles' heel of DeFi; a delay or a hack can ruin everything. To be honest, I didn't pay much attention to APRO before, but now it seems they are really solving real problems. Push and pull modes are designed separately—that's what it means to understand DeFi. But I still have to ask, are APRO's data sources reliable? Everyone wants to build infrastructure, but only a few will survive in the end.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseLandlord

· 4h ago

It's too common to hear about oracles being manipulated by dark forces, and it really wears me out. Honestly, I'm just worried that one day a price feed might be wrong for a few seconds, leading to a liquidation—such a risk is ridiculously high. APRO's flexible solution is indeed interesting, but let's wait and see who can ultimately survive. At the moment of liquidation, I guess they'll be kicking themselves, I can't even imagine it.

View OriginalReply0

GweiWatcher

· 4h ago

Oracles are truly the Achilles' heel of the entire DeFi ecosystem. Once hacked, assets are lost—an expensive lesson learned.

View OriginalReply0

ser_aped.eth

· 4h ago

Oracles being hacked is really a huge scare... We're all betting on the accuracy of information, and any delay or manipulation can lead to liquidation instantly, making it impossible to react in time. Push vs pull logic is indeed perfect, but on the other hand, is APRO reliable... Who dares to truly trust any information source these days? The lifeblood of DeFi all depends on data, which is terrifying. Why is it only now that someone is seriously working on this... It should have been standard long ago, something's off. Flexible solutions sound good, but in the end, it still depends on who can really hold that level of precision.

View OriginalReply0