In the on-chain world, every transaction is permanently recorded. Your position size, entry price, and exit timing are all exposed to the sunlight. This is a double-edged sword for retail investors — information symmetry is achieved, but it also means your strategies can be seen through by big players, making you a target for sniping.
Team configurations in games, liquidity deployment in DeFi, position changes on exchanges… these business decisions that should be kept confidential, in an overly transparent environment, become intelligence for opponents. The true strategic depth is diminished, and the market turns into a zero-sum game of information crushing.
The importance of privacy protection mechanisms thus becomes evident. Only by introducing controllable privacy at certain points can market participants have space to think and strategize, rather than being forced to reveal every move. This is not about opposing transparency, but about finding a balance between transparency and privacy — protecting the parts that truly need confidentiality while maintaining the market’s fundamental trust.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
2
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ConfusedWhale
· 4h ago
So big investors just rely on watching our on-chain footprints to make a profit, huh? That's a huge win.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoMotivator
· 4h ago
That's right, big players survive by exploiting information asymmetry. Full transparency on the chain is indeed a double-edged sword; every move of retail investors is monitored, leaving no privacy whatsoever.
Privacy and transparency need to be balanced; otherwise, the market becomes a slaughterhouse where big fish eat small fish, which is hard to even imagine.
That's why privacy protocols are necessary—some cards still need to be kept close to the chest.
Honestly, a fully open and transparent environment actually makes the weak even weaker.
Transparency can also hurt people.
In the on-chain world, every transaction is permanently recorded. Your position size, entry price, and exit timing are all exposed to the sunlight. This is a double-edged sword for retail investors — information symmetry is achieved, but it also means your strategies can be seen through by big players, making you a target for sniping.
Team configurations in games, liquidity deployment in DeFi, position changes on exchanges… these business decisions that should be kept confidential, in an overly transparent environment, become intelligence for opponents. The true strategic depth is diminished, and the market turns into a zero-sum game of information crushing.
The importance of privacy protection mechanisms thus becomes evident. Only by introducing controllable privacy at certain points can market participants have space to think and strategize, rather than being forced to reveal every move. This is not about opposing transparency, but about finding a balance between transparency and privacy — protecting the parts that truly need confidentiality while maintaining the market’s fundamental trust.