On-chain tokenized stocks have recently made some waves. A leading wallet partnered with a compliant asset provider at the end of November to launch over 100 tokenized US stocks and ETF products on the BNB Chain. It sounds like a backdoor to traditional finance—users don’t need to bother with overseas brokerage accounts or wait for market open times; they can trade "Apple" and "Tesla" 24/7 using stablecoins.



The first month’s data after product launch is quite impressive. Total trading volume reached $1.07 billion, with a minting volume of $37 million in the first 72 hours alone, increasing twentyfold in just four days. It looks lively. But a closer look at the trading distribution shows that most activity is still concentrated on major stocks, with individual assets averaging daily trading volumes between $1 million and $13 million. Calling it a breakout might be an exaggeration, but the fact that people are using it and there’s stable trading flow indicates a genuine demand for this form.

From a product design perspective, it’s more like an entry point for traffic. The underlying compliance auditing and asset custody are handled by professional entities, while the wallet provider manages traffic distribution and user onboarding. The division of roles is quite clear. However, current limitations are obvious—liquidity depth is insufficient, with on-chain locked funds totaling only around $10 million; holdings are highly concentrated, with most on-chain addresses operated by market makers and issuers; and based on social discussion activity, the entire ecosystem is still in a cold start phase.

In simple terms, this exploration is testing a few key questions: Can blockchain truly support the trading of traditional assets? Can wallets evolve into financial gateways? Are Web3 users willing to hold real assets on-chain? The direction is starting to take shape, but there’s still a long way to go before mature applications are realized.
BNB-0.08%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FunGibleTomvip
· 3h ago
Liquidity is so shallow, entering early means you might have to be the bag holder yourself. Not very appealing. --- The data looks impressive, but the actual retail participation is not significant. Isn't this just institutions playing around? --- 24-hour trading sounds great, but the slippage probably will cut you to the point of questioning life. --- A billion in trading volume but only locking over ten million. This leverage... is a bit exciting haha. --- Here's the question: what if it runs away? Can we really trust on-chain custody? --- Cold start is cold start, take it slow. At least exploring this direction is better than doing nothing. --- The concentration of holdings is so high mainly because market makers are playing themselves. True retail investors haven't entered yet. --- It's called a traffic entry point in a nice way, but in a harsh way, it's just a new guise for cutting leeks... but I'm still watching. --- If this thing really works, connecting with overseas brokers might truly be revolutionary. --- But it still feels like the regulatory authorities' attitude towards wallets as financial gateways is a big question mark.
View OriginalReply0
SigmaValidatorvip
· 4h ago
Alright, sounds nice but still a rookie trap. Let's wait and see.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamervip
· 4h ago
Liquidity is so shallow, and early players are all market makers... sounds like a semi-finished product. It's called an "entry point" in a nice way, but I see it more as a front line for cutting leeks. A 1 billion trading volume looks impressive, but the actual ecosystem is dead cold—how could it possibly become popular? If wallets want to become financial gateways, they need to improve liquidity first. The data looks good, but all the holdings are from whales; retail investors going in will just get slaughtered. Real applications are still a long way off; this wave might just be a quick scam and then run. I just want to know, if these tokenized stocks blow up, who will cover the losses? It still feels like an experiment; don’t take it too seriously.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)