The new mechanism brought by PUMPv2 is forming a strong growth flywheel effect. Compared to the previous version, this upgrade has optimized multiple dimensions—with significant improvements from user experience to protocol design. For participants who are optimistic about this direction, the key lies in two aspects: firstly, directly participating in the value capture of PUMPv2 tokens; secondly, deploying projects on the PUMPv2 platform to fully leverage the more efficient ecological infrastructure after the upgrade. This parallel dual-track strategy can better seize the development dividends of the platform.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SilentObservervip
· 2025-12-26 00:57
The flywheel effect sounds great, but the key is whether we can really retain the traffic.
View OriginalReply0
OnChainDetectivevip
· 2025-12-26 00:23
ngl, "growth flywheel" is what they always say right before things go sideways... lemme check the actual transaction patterns before buying this narrative tho
Reply0
Web3Educatorvip
· 2025-12-25 21:40
honestly the flywheel thing sounds nice on paper but let me break this down for my students — most ppl sleep on the infrastructure play and just chase token bags. real talk tho, the dual-track strat they're pushing? that's where the actual edge is. seen this pattern before in like 3 other protocols... deployments > hodling any day
Reply0
TradFiRefugeevip
· 2025-12-25 00:07
I believe in the dual-track parallel approach, but it depends on how the team executes. Just making promises won't earn trust.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHuntressvip
· 2025-12-23 04:50
After research and analysis, the tokenomics design of PUMPv2 does have improvements, but the key still lies in the background of the project party. The dual-track strategy sounds good, but risks also need to be considered.
View OriginalReply0
fork_in_the_roadvip
· 2025-12-23 04:48
I am tired of hearing the term "flywheel effect"; the real issue is whether there are enough ecological projects and if the cold start can survive for three months.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiHeirvip
· 2025-12-23 04:44
It should be pointed out that I will reserve my opinion on the argument of the "flywheel effect" until the on-chain data has not been sufficiently falsified. According to the logic of the White Paper, the dual-track strategy sounds good, but the key question is—who will pay for this rise? Wait, I remember that wave of projects in 2017, which also said the same thing... And what was the result? It is obvious that infrastructure optimization ≠ reaching a value consensus. Is this time really different? Thinking carefully, the core lies in the deployment of the project. The revenue model of directly holding coins is still the old approach. To be honest, only those who can understand the logical flaws in this article deserve to play PUMPv2. Undoubtedly, the upgrade itself is not a problem; the issue lies in the participants' depth of understanding. Most people haven't figured out whether they are liquidity providers or builders.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightSnapHuntervip
· 2025-12-23 04:39
The flywheel effect sounds good, but can this upgrade really stabilize things, or is it just another scheme to play people for suckers?
View OriginalReply0
GasDevourervip
· 2025-12-23 04:30
Flywheel effect? Sounds like another trap, but whether it can actually run is another story.
View OriginalReply0
View More
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)