Bloomberg just dropped some numbers that'll make traditional investors sweat. Since launch, Bitcoin ETF holders have been crushing it compared to Treasury and bond investors. We're talking measurable outperformance here.



The classic 60/40 portfolio split? Yeah, that's looking pretty dated now. The data suggests a shift is already underway – digital assets are carving out real space in institutional allocations. Not a maybe anymore. It's happening. 🚀
BTC0.06%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeSobbervip
· 12-11 13:49
That 60/40 setup really should be retired; I said it a long time ago.
View OriginalReply0
LidoStakeAddictvip
· 12-09 07:49
The 60/40 portfolio should have been shattered long ago, and this time Bloomberg's data confirms it.
View OriginalReply0
BetterLuckyThanSmartvip
· 12-09 01:07
The 60/40 portfolio should have died long ago—wake up, everyone.
View OriginalReply0
FlatTaxvip
· 12-09 01:04
The 60/40 portfolio really should retire. Just look at this data—institutions have already been quietly rebalancing their portfolios.
View OriginalReply0
MerkleDreamervip
· 12-09 01:02
The 60/40 portfolio should have died long ago; institutions have been itching for a change for a while.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerAirdropvip
· 12-09 00:59
The 60/40 allocation really needs to retire; institutions have already been quietly buying the dip in Bitcoin.
View OriginalReply0
LightningSentryvip
· 12-09 00:59
The 60/40 portfolio should have died long ago. How much do these institutions, who are only now realizing it, have to catch up on?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)