#比特币对比代币化黄金 I've been pondering a question lately: why do people always like to compare $BTC with gold?

Gold, to put it bluntly, is a product of old-world consensus. Where does its value come from? Its physical rarity is one aspect, but more importantly, it's the collective memory of humanity over thousands of years—from the gold standard to the Bretton Woods system, with sovereign states backing it and making it a hard currency across cultures. But that's also where the problem lies: gold relies on systems of power to function. Mining, transportation, storage—none of these steps can do without centralized control. Essentially, it's an economic anchor for the agricultural and industrial eras.

Now, look at $BTC. It's a completely different narrative logic.

Its scarcity isn't physical; it's hardcoded—21 million max, and no one can change that. Its value foundation isn't determined by any government, but is built on proof-of-work, cryptography, and distributed ledgers—verifiable mathematical rules. More crucially, no single authority can control it. The global network of computing power produces, verifies, and protects this system on its own.

So what $BTC really anchors is the future of the digitally native economy.

Two types of assets, two sets of underlying logic. Gold relies on power to maintain consensus; $BTC builds trust through algorithms. Which side are you on?