Recently, a project that once secured 80 million in funding has sparked extensive discussions in the Crypto Assets community. This project not only has a strong background and a considerable amount of funding, but its actual performance has been quite disappointing.

It is reported that the performance of the project's token SCR is particularly astonishing. The project party had serious conflicts with the community, even belittling supporters as "electronic beggars". However, ironically, it was these despised supporters who injected real money into the project.

Even more shocking is that despite having such massive funding support, the project's current revenue situation is concerning. According to reliable sources, its revenue is less than $1000, a figure that starkly contrasts with its financing scale, raising widespread doubts in the market about its operational capabilities and business model.

This event has also sparked deep reflection in the Crypto Assets community about the gap between project valuation and actual value. Many investors have begun to reconsider whether investment decisions should be made solely based on a project's background and financing scale.

At the same time, some market analysts pointed out that this case highlights the uncertainty and risks of the Crypto Assets market. They urge investors to not only pay attention to the project's financing situation and background when making investment decisions but also to thoroughly research substantive factors such as its business model, team execution capability, and market demand.

With the spread of this news, investors in the Crypto Assets market have expressed that they will be more cautious in assessing project value and will no longer blindly follow projects with high financing amounts. This event will undoubtedly have a profound impact on the investment ecosystem of the entire Crypto Assets industry.