🎉 Hey Gate Square friends! Non-stop perks and endless excitement—our hottest posting reward events are ongoing now! The more you post, the more you win. Don’t miss your exclusive goodies! 🚀
🆘 #Gate 2025 Semi-Year Community Gala# | Square Content Creator TOP 10
Only 1 day left! Your favorite creator is one vote away from TOP 10. Interact on Square to earn Votes—boost them and enter the prize draw. Prizes: iPhone 16 Pro Max, Golden Bull sculpture, Futures Vouchers!
Details 👉 https://www.gate.com/activities/community-vote
1️⃣ #Show My Alpha Points# | Share your Alpha points & gains
Post your
Recently, a notable legislative proposal in Pennsylvania has sparked widespread discussion. Democratic Representative Ben Waxman introduced a new bill (HB1812) aimed at imposing strict restrictions on public officials and their immediate family members participating in Crypto Assets-related activities.
The core content of the bill includes prohibiting public officials from seeking benefits through Crypto Assets during their term of office, covering areas such as the issuance, promotion, or trading of digital assets with which they have financial interests. More specifically, the bill stipulates that relevant individuals may not engage in Crypto Assets transactions exceeding 1000 dollars during their term and within one year after leaving office.
It is worth noting that the bill also requires relevant parties to liquidate their holdings of crypto assets within 90 days after the bill takes effect. The bill proposes severe penalties for violations, with a maximum sentence of 5 years in prison or a fine of $50,000.
Representative Waxman stated that the introduction of this bill is in response to recent controversies surrounding certain public officials using their positions for personal gain. This initiative reflects lawmakers' increasing concern about the financial behaviors of public officials, especially in the emerging Crypto Assets sector.
However, this proposal has also sparked discussions about the boundaries of personal financial freedom and government regulation. Supporters argue that it is a necessary measure to prevent conflicts of interest, while critics are concerned that it may excessively restrict the legitimate investment rights of public officials.
In any case, the introduction of this bill marks a new advancement in the regulation of Crypto Assets in the political arena, which may have far-reaching effects on future related legislation. As discussions deepen, we will continue to monitor the development of this bill and the potential impacts it may bring.