re centralized sequencer being fine long-term also idt we have an answer to that from tech / product perspective (eg re fault tolerance you could easily see one big screwup then nobody wants it anymore) or regulatory (we dont have clarity yet, need to wait and see)

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NotAFinancialAdvicevip
· 08-15 15:53
idk fr... centralization always sus tbh
Reply0
BoredRiceBallvip
· 08-15 14:43
Just wait and see... The truth will come out sooner or later.
View OriginalReply0
Blockblindvip
· 08-13 22:38
Eh, we have to wait and see again.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseLandlordvip
· 08-13 04:36
Ah, this will always have to wait.
View OriginalReply0
ParallelChainMaxivip
· 08-13 04:31
What the heck, talking all day long.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwichVictimvip
· 08-13 04:28
Take a gamble, give it a shot
View OriginalReply0
DaisyUnicornvip
· 08-13 04:28
Be careful, centralized little buds might wither away~
View OriginalReply0
AirdropBuffetvip
· 08-13 04:21
Seeking stability is the long-term strategy.
View OriginalReply0
HashRateHermitvip
· 08-13 04:18
hmm no one can give a definite answer
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseLandlordvip
· 08-13 04:15
Too lazy to watch, just slacking off.
View OriginalReply0
View More
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)