📢 Exclusive on Gate Square — #PROVE Creative Contest# is Now Live!
CandyDrop × Succinct (PROVE) — Trade to share 200,000 PROVE 👉 https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/46469
Futures Lucky Draw Challenge: Guaranteed 1 PROVE Airdrop per User 👉 https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/46491
🎁 Endless creativity · Rewards keep coming — Post to share 300 PROVE!
📅 Event PeriodAugust 12, 2025, 04:00 – August 17, 2025, 16:00 UTC
📌 How to Participate
1.Publish original content on Gate Square related to PROVE or the above activities (minimum 100 words; any format: analysis, tutorial, creativ
Recently, a series of digital initiatives by the Shaolin Temple has garnered widespread attention and discussion. According to reports, the temple has invested 380 million yuan in building a digital cultural relics database, but there has been controversy regarding the direction of fund usage. Some reports suggest that part of the funds has been used for Bitcoin investment, which is shocking.
In addition, the Shaolin Temple has launched a metaverse project worth $200 million, involving cryptocurrency transfers to offshore accounts, raising questions about the flow of funds. The boldness of these operations even surpasses that of some controversial cryptocurrency projects.
The most striking feature is the "Cyber Merit System" launched by the Shaolin Temple. Followers can scan a code to donate and light up virtual lotuses, or even unlock the Abbot AI chanting service for 888 yuan. This approach of combining the traditional concept of merit with blockchain technology has raised concerns about the commercialization of faith.
It is worth mentioning that the Shaolin Temple has also registered 87 blockchain-related trademarks, covering various fields from electronic wooden fish to virtual incense offering. This widespread application of blockchain technology in religious activities raises questions about whether it has regarded blockchain as a fundraising tool.
Reports indicate that the Shaolin Temple even used Bitcoin to pay for the rent of an apartment in London, and then converted it into donations for merit. This complex flow of funds has raised public questions about the financial management of religious institutions.
This series of events has sparked people's reflection on how religious sites can balance tradition and innovation in the digital age. Although technological advancements offer new possibilities for the dissemination of religion, how to embrace digitalization while maintaining the essence of religion remains a question that requires careful consideration.
Please allow me to create a comment in a different style.