#SUPRA# Let's take a look at the analysis of brainwashing rhetoric.

1. "I have already lost, but I am still adding to my position"
"A few WUs have been invested! I don't care if I'm a bit poorer!"
"Sell everything and increase the position by 1000U!"

Function: It gives people the impression that "this person is not a retail investor, but a loyal veteran player," as if he is an "insider steadfast believer," thereby creating an atmosphere that "the coin price is about to rebound."

2. "The institutions haven't given up, so I'll accompany them"
"Equal chips with institutions, institutions give up, I admit defeat!"

Function: Implies that "institutions are still present", using the psychological game of "institutional support" to lure retail investors into believing that a rebound is possible.

3. "The technology is actually good, it's just that no one has noticed it."
"The Movm architecture APP can be deployed..."
"The AI test network is not mature, but it can be used."

Function: A typical "pie-in-the-sky" technical narrative - even if the project is a complete mess, it still digs up some scraps to package as "potential value" to attract retail investors who are unaware of the technology to blindly regain their confidence.

4. "Emotional Venting + Faith Patch"
"Not even as good as air coins" → "Not as bad as it is today!" → "I admit defeat!"
Contradictory, but it is precisely this "emotional ups and downs" that easily infects others and resonates, especially those retail investors who are already trapped, who will be influenced by this kind of "awakening faith" tone.

🐶 The possible intention behind this kind of rhetoric:

Community administrators guide emotions, prevent panic selling, and encourage holding coins.

Semi-rhythmic inducement (worried that no one will take over, not easy to sell out)

✅ Correct mindset advice:
Don't feel the illusion of "missing the bottom" just because others are "increasing their positions."

Be aware: Most crypto projects either go to zero or stab you in the back before they go to zero.

See clearly the logical fallacies, emotional manipulation, and technical "packaging terminology," and don't be bound by "belief."