- Pin
- What are the Gate Post Community Growth Points? Learn how it works and what rewards you can get! 👇
- Community Morning Brief — Top Headlines 🔹 June 4, 2025
1. Data: Institutional buyers have increased their Bitcoin holdings by 417,000 BTC so far in 2025.
2. The U.S. has presented Vietnam with a complex list of demands in tariff negotiations.
3. Arkham stated on social media that Satoshi Nakamoto’s net worth has now surpassed Bill Gates’.
4. Trump’s Truth Social has filed an application for a Bitcoin ETF.
5. Bloomberg analyst: IBIT’s Bitcoin holdings could surpass Satoshi Nakamoto’s by the end of next year, becoming the world’s largest Bitcoin holder.
6. Attendees of Trump’s crypto dinner rec - #Satoshi Net Worth Tops Bill Gates#
Arkham announced on social media that Satoshi Nakamoto is now wealthier than Bill Gates, with a net worth reaching $116.7 billion compared to Gates' $116.2 billion.
💬 What does this mean for the crypto market? How will Satoshi's wealth impact Bitcoin's future and interest from mainstream investors?
#Trump BTC ETF Application#
Truth Social, operated by Trump Media & Technology Group, has applied for a Bitcoin spot ETF through a partner. The fund aims to track Bitcoin's spot price performance. If approved, Truth Social would be the first social media platfor - 👀 #GateCryptoGiveaway# - Whose eyes are these?
Memecoin Quiz: Guess the memecoins based on the eyes below!
💰 $10 Points * 4 winners
To join:
1️⃣ Follow Gate_Post
2️⃣ Like this post
3️⃣ Drop your answer in the comments
📅 Ends at 04:00 AM, Jun 7 (UTC)
SEC registration of stocks on the blockchain means tokenization of traditional financial instruments, but unlike previous "synthetic assets" or STOs, it is directly anchored to equity approved by the SEC. If stock tokens are bound to CEG, the blockchain merely becomes a database, contradicting the intent of "eliminating intermediaries." Regardless of the outcome, this marks the beginning of a new era — a transitional phase where financial power shifts from "institutional monopoly" to "technical-regulatory collusion."