In the current Web3 social ecosystem, the Kaito platform has introduced a rather controversial rating system. The most significant function of this system seems to provide users with a stage to showcase themselves. In an environment heavily influenced by traditional education, people often prefer to measure value through concrete numbers and rankings. Kaito's ratings and leaderboards precisely meet this psychological need, providing users with a way to demonstrate their presence within the community, and even becoming a credential for introducing themselves to international friends.

However, the actual significance and fairness of this scoring system have sparked widespread discussion. Some believe that the increase in scores is not highly correlated with content creation, but rather depends more on the quantity of ICT (Kaito token) held and the frequency of interactions. This mechanism may lead the platform to focus too much on short-term gains, neglecting the importance of high-quality content.

What is even more concerning is that the Kaito platform seems to be putting a lot of effort into project promotion while ignoring the actual needs and feedback of users. This approach has caused widespread dissatisfaction, including among well-known overseas users.

To ensure long-term healthy development, the Kaito platform urgently needs to reassess its operational strategies. Shifting the focus to user experience and content quality, rather than overly relying on numerical indicators, is the key to sustainable development. Only by truly being user-centered and valuing community feedback can Kaito establish a foothold in the fiercely competitive Web3 social space and achieve long-term growth.